Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

popup competes with modal dialog for priority #1792

Open
slicerbot opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

popup competes with modal dialog for priority #1792

slicerbot opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@slicerbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue was created automatically from an original Mantis Issue. Further discussion may take place here.

@slicerbot slicerbot added this to the Slicer 4.11.0 milestone Mar 12, 2020
@jcfr jcfr modified the milestones: Slicer 4.11.0, Slicer 5.1.0 Mar 12, 2020
@jamesobutler
Copy link
Contributor

I'm currently unable to determine what this issue was detailing as the screenshots are unavailable for download from the mantis bug tracker. The most detailed description of the remaining issue is the following, but not sure what it is referring to.

However the "Slicer competes with itself" in this specific issue report still exists. For example, the Save window can become hidden behind the main Slicer window; the only way to raise it again is to click on one of the slice viewer popups.

@lassoan Do you know the details of this issue from memory? You last commented on this issue in Sept 2017

Thanks for testing. We'll revisit this after Qt5 migration.

I could only guess about a pop up such as a warningDisplay or something that isn't appropriate parented to the modal dialog (maybe QMainWindow) in which case it hides the modal dialog behind the Slicer window or something.

@lassoan lassoan modified the milestones: Slicer 5.1, Backlog Oct 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants